Team Rural - Columnists
 -



     Who Will Congressman      Kingston Support?
by Christie Fisher
 
( click the pictures for links )

Congressman Jack Kingston may have to pick another date to the 2012 Presidential election season. He had come out in support of Newt Gingrich who brought Mr. Kingston to Congress in 1994.  Mr. Gingrich has a little problem. Seems the  present Mrs. Gingrich needed a little Mediterranean cruise. 

Gingrich, known for his knowledge of history, should have remembered what happened in the race to replace the late great Ted Kennedy. Democratic candidate Martha Coakley took a  weeks‘s vacation between the primary and  general election that helped Republican Scott Brown win in Massachusetts.  Nineteen campaign staffers quit Mr. Gingrich’s first day back. Former governor Sonny Purdue, Gingrich’s co-chair, has also quit Gingrich’s committee. Mr. Gingrich appears to be toast.
 
There are other choices for Congressman Kingston to consider. I heard that Texas Governor Rick Perry might be ready to throw his Stetson into the ring.
Gov. Perry is planning to host an August 6 day of prayer with the American Family Association to seriously appeal to his base. The AFA is a non-profit network of 192 Christian radio stations. This group and the day of prayer festivities will exclude non-Christians. The Southern Poverty Law Center calls the AFA a hate group. Bryan Fischer, AFhA’s director claims that gay people are responsible for the Nazi Party’s murder of 6 million Jews. In a YouTube, Fischer claims that “virtually all of Hitler’s Brown Shirts were male homosexuals because Hitler found them to be especially vicious warriors.”
 
Not surprisingly, Fischer has said that he does not think that gays should hold public office. Seems to me though, if he thinks that gays are vicious warriors, he should want our armed forces to be filled with gay men. It is amazing to me that someone associating with views like this can even be considered a serious candidate of a major political party.
 
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (I do love his name) is being strongly courted by the Republicans to run.
Representative Kris Crawford of South Carolina wants to draft Christie because he is “combative, confrontational and unafraid to break some "china”.  Never ever voting against anything military, Congressman Kingston should like him.
 
Then there is former governor Mitt Romney. Mr. Romney is loved by Republicans for running a company that increased corporate profits by firing workers. Congressman Kingston could love that.
But Mr. Romney did something good for healthcare in Massachusetts so that makes him hated by the Republican establishment.
 
Tim Pawlenty wants to run on a record of fiscal conservatism.
His record of fiscal conservatism is similar to President George W. Bush’s record in that he left Minnesota with a $6.2 billion deficit for his successor to fix.

Half-term former governor Sarah Palin is loved because Republican love good lookin’ women with lots of children. Congressman Kingston should like her because several times he equated being patriotic with wearing flag pins. Ms Palin wears lots of flag pins, crosses, and stars of David.

Congressman Kingston has worked with Congressman Michelle Bachmannn. Why, I don’t know.I do know that Republicans favor good lookin’ women with lots of children.

Former Obama China Ambassador Jon Huntsman also is in the race. I am not sure why he is running other than Republicans like good lookin’ men with lots of children.
 
















I know Congressman Kingston could never support Congressman Ron Paul. Watching Mr. Paul’s YouTube stance against war, any liberal’s heart will be warmed. And, for that  reason Congressman Kingston will run fast in the other direction.

Rick Santorum is running again. Pennsylvania’s former senator is known for being as anti choice as any human can be.






That and the fact that Republicans approve of good lookin’ men with lots of children are the only reasons Santorum is running.
 
Herman Cain is fun to watch in that he is to the Republican Party in the same way that Michael Steele is to the Republican Party. He wants to simplify and make laws to be passed no more than three pages long. Maybe he wants them
all to fit inside one of his pizza boxes.
Because Republicans don’t read bills, they don’t care how long they are. Congressman Kingston is told by his Party how to vote so I don’t think short bills would matter to him.
 
Buddy Roemer? This is personal. I voted for Buddy Roemer in Louisiana before he realized he could get more votes by turning into a Republican. I have no idea why his name pops up.

 





“The Donald” Trump appeared again threatening the Republican Party to do as he says. I seriously doubt that Congressman Kingston cares what “The Donald” says as long as he sends a contribution.

Who will Congressman Kingston support? I have no idea. Congressman Kingston will ultimately support the Republican Presidential Candidate that corporate and military America select and pay for. Any of the above mentioned would probably do an excellent job of continuing to turn America into an oligarchy. They will do this paradin’ good lookin’ men and women with large families claimin’ they love all Americans who look and think just like they do.






 BACHMANN-TURNER OVERDRIVE
by
 Charles Hill
 
‘Here's something, here's something,
 Here's a lover you're never gonna forget, baby’
         LyricsYou ain’t seen nothing yetBachman-Turner Overdrive

Honest, you can’t make this stuff up. Michelle Bachmann (R-Mn.) possible Presidential candidate
              and Eric Turner (R-In.)

              think rape is overstated; think rape is a ploy, think rape is consensual. Bachmann stated, ‘Rape is not rape, unless it’s violent’ [this comes from a proposed Bill that Bachmann and fellow Minnesota representative; John Kline and Chip Cravaack tried to push through].

  Really! Michelle tell that to the 92,455 (reported) women raped last year. Here’s another statistic your State Minnesota came in at 21 in the number of rapes (reported) Here’s another statistic: 98% of those reporting rape knew their assailant!
  
Mr. Turner fares no better he thinks many woman use rape as a ploy to get an abortion. It is apparent that these two are pandering to a far right crowd;  out of one side of their mouth they say ‘get the Government out of my life’, but really mean I want the government to tell you what you can and should do; but not me, and not people like me!

   That’s right, people like them. People that believe the earth is only 6,500 years old; think ‘liberal’ scientists hide dinosaur bones to prove their presumption that evolution is fact. The worst part is not their collective belief that progress is a four letter word, but that they have no shame. That they find it perfectly acceptable to exploit a horrendous crime for personal gain. Make no mistake that is exactly what they are doing.
 
   They are using those raped as pawns to advance a no-choice agenda. This is not about rape. It’s about a woman’s right to choose. A woman being allowed to decide what to do with her body. There is no more personal decision than that.  No one, no one should have the ability to tell her what she can and can’t do. I sincerely doubt that any woman makes that choice lightly or without due diligence.
  
    I take issue with those that refer to pro-choice as pro-abortion. No-one is pro-abortion! I am pro-choice;anti-abortion, my choice is no. Choice! I would not be presumptuous enough to think I have the knowledge or ability to speak for someone else. In the words of President Clinton; ‘…abortion should be: safe, legal, and rare.’
 
   I hear those on the far right decry life as precious, life is a miracle, life is a gift, all good points, all true. I will remind them that there is a big difference between pro-life and pro-birth. You cannot be pro-life if you turn your back on the living. We can argue back and forth as to when life begins, but I think we can agree that when a being exist outside of the womb, life is definitely at play.

   How can you be pro-life, if you vote to end programs such as: head start, planned parenthood, healthcare, welfare, and education?
   How can you be pro-life if you turn you back on an individual when the individual is in need?
   How can you be pro-life when you exploit a woman’s nightmare for your own gain? How can you?
                                                           OLD WITH THE BOLD
IN WITH THE NEWT
 By, Charlie Hill
 
                        At first glance one can not look at the current field of Republican Presidential candidates and not think of ‘A Day at the Races’ a comedic opera starring the Marx brothers. The new front runner is a pseudo-intellectual grumpy community college history professor, that the ill-inform find enlightening. Out of the lead and back on the bench of have-beens that still want the jersey but will not get in the game, (Palin, Trump, and now Cain), hangers-on awaiting the next screening for a reality show. Foxcasters in situ. The overwhelming feeling within the Republican Party (other then taking down a sitting President), is anyone but Romney. A dilemma to be certain, viewed as: North-Eastern-elite, out-of-touch, cold, and most importantly, (though not spoken) Mormon. This is a Party that is bombarded daily with fear-mongering, hate filled rhetoric, so much so that they have lost the ability to act rationally, and the direction of their actions are orchestrated by the negative emotion of disdain and distrust. They are for the most part victims of bad programming. Newt is not a product of repackaging; Newt is a consequence of regifting.
                        The Republican Party, (the party that brought us some great leaders and men of distinction, men that put Country first, not McCain style bumper sticker first, but really first, men like Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Big George Bush, who in a moment of true patriotism reverted on his ‘No new taxes’ pledge, broke an oath he made to a lobbyist and did what was right for the Country), this style of Republican, not what we witness today, a gathering of lemmings in schlep-lock, taking marching orders from lobbyist, and A.M. radio host. It has becoming increasingly evident that this Republican Party is one that needs an enemy, needs someone or something to loathe, back in the day of Republican reason the enemy was communism, (of course you had the Joe McCarthy’s) and though loonies such as these received some air time they were not given a show. Now the enemy is anyone that does not agree, and perhaps progress, not progress in the form of the progressive movement, but any type of progress, be it food standards in schools to the radical idea of non-fossil fuels. The enemy is more then change, the enemy is the face of change. Enemies occur when ideas dwindle, when there are no goals, no plans, no thoughts, enemies are the result running on empty. Enemies are the by-product of myopia and fear; enemies are created and characterized by those that can only foster fear as a driving force of hope.
                       





Patriot

Speak.
We hear you.



The periphery stands alert,
secretly waiting for your guiding voice,
silently watching your unswerving faith
in a humanity unworthy.
 


Marching proton of civilization,
fighting on the front lines of liberty,
through segregated race oppressions,
and chauvinistic sex suppressions,
now universal health repressions,
you freedom ride and town hall collide
to usher your country into progression.
 


These efforts are not in vain.
Your shouts of knowledge in the streets,
your knocks of truth upon our doors,
your steadfast hope for things yet to be
affect mankind clandestinely.



We want you to know:
we may be still, but not unmoved.


 Speak.
We are listening.

 Poem written by: Amulet Chambers






On Wisconsin
By Christie Fisher

In our recent history, more and more American jobs have been shipped overseas. The simple reason is that away from the unions, companies can more easily find workers who will work for low wages and lack the power to demand safe working conditions. Simply put, profits rise when worker pay goes down.
Workers in non-union states like Georgia earn on average, $5,333 less than workers in collective bargaining states. Workers in non-union states like Georgia are 21% more likely to NOT have health insurance as compared to workers in collective bargaining states. Workplace deaths are 51% higher in states like Georgia that do not have collective bargaining agreements.  I don’t want to imagine what is happening in sweat shops in faraway lands where our socks and underwear are being made. 
Wisconsin is one of our most progressive states and the birth place of many union innovations. So what happened?



 
 
Republicans gained the upper hand in the state, as elsewhere claiming that the Republican Party was the party of job creation. Since being elected, jobs have been nowhere on the Republican agenda.  Republican Scott Walker, marched in as Wisconsin governor, gave his friends and business supporters all the tax breaks they wanted. Until he became governor, the state had been fiscally sound. By handing out tax breaks, Gov. Walker created a “budget crisis” that he said had to be balanced. Remember, I said that HE created this imbalance. In his grand plan, he was setting the stage for what he really wanted…
Power. He wanted power and all of it. He announced that the unions would give up collective bargaining as well as salary and benefits for the “good of the state”. Immediately, the unions said, sure, we will do our part and donate the money as needed. But for Gov. Walker, that was not enough. He had to have the collective bargaining rights even though collective bargaining has nothing to do with balancing the budget.





 
 
Taking away collective bargaining rights takes power away from the workers and gives it back to their employers—Gov. Walker’s rich friends. Ah, this is the beginning of the issue.  Stripping the onion even more, we find this thing called “Citizens United” that passed in the Supreme Court last year. It gives companies the same rights as individuals. With this, businesses can spend unlimited amounts in elections. Who spends the most in elections usually wins. The Republicans have ONLY one group standing between them and total domination in funding elections---ORGANIZED LABOR.

IF (WHEN??) businesses can strip power away from organized labor, they have it all. That is what this is about. The Republicans won the last election claiming that they know how to get jobs back. Nope, they haven’t gone there.  In fact, their plans are to take millions of jobs away. They have spent their time since the election consolidating power for their rich benefactors. They know that the American public is too busy to notice. Gov. Walker showed his true colors when, last week, he thought he was talking to his rich benefactor, David Koch, who gave him $43,000 in his campaign as well as donated a million dollars to organizations that attacked his opponent. Gov. Walker said in this phone call that he intended to lie to the Democratic legislators to get them back into the Wisconsin capitol. Then rather than talk to them as he was going to claim to do, he was instead going to “trick them” (meaning LIE to them), getting his quorum, and doing the voting to do away with collective bargaining before the Democrats would know what had happened. Nice man, huh.

 


Of the top 10 sources of money for the 2010 election, only three contributed to Democratic candidates. Those three were ALL UNIONS. IF the Republicans can take POWER AWAY from the unions, then they have no competition –meaning Democrats have no source of big money--for the next election—and the next—and the next.

Understand? Republicans want no competition for the next election as they continue to buy Congress and governors. They also want to weaken worker’s rights so that giant US companies don’t have to worry about collective bargaining giving workers a safe workplace and forcing the companies to pay the worker a living wage and healthcare benefits. The rich can get richer and the poor can get poorer—Mr. Moneybag’s American dream.  
 
The Moral of the Story
The next time your Republican friends start throwing the red meat words out to you –saying Democrats are socialists, communists, vegan, whatever—here is a word for you to throw back at them--OLIGARCHY.


OLIGARCHY is a form of power in which power effectively rests with a small group of people, usually the rich and powerful. This is the rule of a few over the many rather than a democracy of, by, and for the people.




Republicans are supporting an OLIGARCHY whereby the ones in charge (owning the Congress, Supreme Court, and making the rules) are the richest of the rich—like the Koch brothers. –Throw that back next time someone calls you a socialist! (Look the Koch Brothers, Cato Institute, Americans for Prosperity and Heritage Foundation. Also, next time you attend a Jack Kingston Town Hall, notice where his visual aids are from—Heritage Foundation—rather than the US government!)

A Recipe for Disaster
(Paging a WordSmith)
By Christie Fisher
Chatham County

The main problem with Democrats is that we believe that if we speak the truth with facts and history on our side, we will get our message out.  The public is wise. We will win the day.
WRONG! We make too many assumptions and lose much more than we should. How could we imagine that people could possibly not want health care insurance reform? The Republicans knew that that could not be the issue. Their recipe was to change the subject, throw in a little fear--like killing grandma using death panels-- and that would take care of things.  See, the Republicans have no intention of promoting governmental policies that help the common man but they know how to say the right words to win these voters to support their side. 

They have a secret weapon--OK, not much of a secret--a man who is a word smith, political consultant and pollster, Dr. Frank Luntz. They even know to put Luntz on Fox “news” so as to get their words out on television every day.
If you watched President Obama speaking to the Republican members of Congress last week, you heard him call out a greeting to Dr. Luntz who was sitting in the front row.  Later President Obama singled out Luntz as a symbol of what is wrong in Washington. He said of Luntz’s work and his great importance to the Republican Party, “It’s all about tactics, and it’s not solving problems.”
Dr. Luntz’s specialty is “testing language and finding words that will help his clients sell their product or turn public opinion on an issue or candidate.” 


In 2007 he wrote a best seller, Words That Work: It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear.
On health care, Luntz stated that Republicans could not be against reform or they would lose. So the proper words were that Republicans must warn against a “Washington takeover of health care and insist that patients would have to stand in line with Washington bureaucrats in charge of health care.”
Ever heard those lines before? Of course, you have.
Today, Dr. Luntz has issued a seventeen page memo titled, “How to Kill Financial Reform”.  In this, he tells Republicans that even though reform is much needed, there are ways to kill it.  He says that Republicans must call regulatory reform a massive governmental takeover. As opponents, Republicans must link the package to the financial industry bailout. OK, this is a lie but a little link never hurt anyone, right? (We must invade Iraq because there is a link between that nation and the terrorists who bombed us on 9/11. OK, a little lie but it got us into the war we wanted, didn’t it!
As far as financial reform goes, Republicans must acknowledge the need for reform and say that the status quo is not an option. That said, Republicans don’t really want reform because the Democrats are in charge and success would help Democrats in the next election. Oops, we can’t let that happen!  In order to kill financial reform Dr. Luntz says the Republicans must change the subject. They must say that the Democratic Reform Bill is filled with bank bailouts, “lobbyist loopholes” (This ought to be one we hear often.) and additional layers of complicated government bureaucracy. The critical advantage for Republicans, Luntz says is that bad decisions in Washington by bureaucrats led to the economic crash in the first place so this incompetence is the common ground on which to build support.  (Never mind that that Republicans were in charge when the worst decisions were made.) He goes on, “52% of voters say that they would be much less likely to vote for their member of Congress if they voted for a financial reform bill that contained a fund to bailout banks and Wall Street.”
“Public outrage about the bailout of banks and Wall Street is a simmering time bomb set to go off on Election Day. Frankly, the single best way to kill any legislation is to link it to the Big Bank Bailout.” Remember, it has already been said that there is no link.
The next best thing that Republicans can do is to say the thing was “written in secret by lobbyists.”

Republicans must promote themselves as agents for change but insist that the changes do not need to come from more Washington governmental authority. Luntz says, “A new agency with new bureaucrats is not a change we can believe in. It’s not a change at all.” (Cute, huh.)
We know the song. We know the dance. Are we going to respond in our usual way and allow the Republicans once again to win the word war and kill badly needed financial reform? Paging a Dr. Luntz to work for the Democrats---Paging a Dr---. Luntz to work for the Democrats…